inequality: affect economic inequality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect economic inequality 1.00
affect inequality 0.96
is economic problem 0.85
is economic 0.85
affect economic growth 0.84
be bad for economic growth 0.81
be related to extent of poverty 0.81
be related to extent of absolute poverty 0.79
be consequense of underdevelopment 0.77
be bad for economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be consequense of underdevelopment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(poverty, be consequense of underdevelopment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, be consequense of underdevelopment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inequality, affect inequality)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect inequality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inequality, affect inequality)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(poverty, be consequense of underdevelopment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)