inequality: affect education

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect education 1.00
be in education 0.93
be in education important 0.92
affect high school students 0.81
affect children 0.80
affect to academic performance of students 0.80
affect child development 0.79
affect to academic performance 0.79
affect to performance of students 0.78
affects community 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(inequality, affect education)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect child development)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect children)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect education)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect education)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(problem, affect to academic performance of students)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect education)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(poverty, affect education)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect education)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, affect education)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect education)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(poverty, affect children)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect children)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(poverty, affect child development)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(poverty, affect child development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inequality, affect education)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(inequality, be in education)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in education)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(inequality, be in education important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in education)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inequality, be in education)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in education important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(inequality, be in education important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in education important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(inequality, affects community)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(inequality, affects community)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(inequality, affects community)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affects community)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(inequality, affect education)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(problem, affect to academic performance of students)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(poverty, affect education)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(poverty, affect education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(poverty, affect children)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(poverty, affect child development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(inequality, affect education)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(problem, affect to academic performance of students)