inequality: affect inequality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect inequality 1.00
affect economic inequality 0.96
be related to extent of poverty 0.80
be related to extent of absolute poverty 0.77
has quality injustice 0.76
affect overpopulation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inequality, affect inequality)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect inequality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inequality, affect inequality)