inequality: be bad for australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for australia 1.00
be in india 0.81
exist in canada 0.81
is usa 0.81
be problem in usa 0.80
be problem for india 0.80
be problem in india 0.79
be in india problem 0.79
exist in uk 0.78
be high in america 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(evil, be in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(evil, be in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is usa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(evil, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(illiteracy, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be in india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(illiteracy, is usa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is usa)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(poverty, be in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(overpopulation, be in india problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem for india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for australia)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(inequality, be high in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(inequality, be high in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be high in america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(inequality, be high in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(inequality, exist in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is usa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, be in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in india)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be in india problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem for india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be bad for australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(evil, be in india)