inequality: be bad for growth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for growth 1.00
be bad for economic growth 0.95
affect growth 0.90
affect economic growth 0.88
be bad for economy 0.84
reduce growth 0.84
be good for economy 0.83
be bad for business 0.82
is economic problem 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(inequality, reduce growth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(inequality, reduce growth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(inequality, reduce growth)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(inequality, reduce growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)