inequality: be important from economic standpoint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important from economic standpoint 1.00
be important from standpoint 0.96
is economic 0.80
is economic problem 0.79
be bad for economic growth 0.79
affect economic growth 0.78
be good for economy 0.76
be important for development meritnation 0.75
be important for development 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)