inequality: be important from standpoint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important from standpoint 1.00
be important from economic standpoint 0.96
is good thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(inequality, be important from standpoint)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inequality, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from economic standpoint)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from standpoint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)