inequality: be related to extent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to extent 1.00
be related to extent of poverty 0.87
be related to extent of absolute poverty 0.85
be related 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(poverty, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(poverty, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(poverty, be related)