inequality: be related to extent of poverty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to extent of poverty 1.00
be related to extent of absolute poverty 0.96
be related to extent 0.87
affect economic inequality 0.81
affect inequality 0.80
be cause of food insecurity 0.76
be major cause of malnutrition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be major cause of malnutrition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poverty, be major cause of malnutrition)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(poverty, be major cause of malnutrition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(inequality, affect inequality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(inequality, be related to extent)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of absolute poverty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(inequality, be related to extent)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inequality, affect inequality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect inequality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect inequality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be related to extent of poverty)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(poverty, be major cause of malnutrition)