inequality: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be in quality of life 0.81
be bad for business 0.80
has quality evil 0.80
have taste good 0.79
is bad thing 0.79
be bad for growth 0.76
is necessarily bad thing 0.76
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, have taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, have taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inequality, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for growth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)