inequality: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be in quality of life 0.83
have taste good 0.81
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
be more attractive than good 0.76
has quality definition 0.76
be bad for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, have taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality evil)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, have taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality evil)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(evil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(evil, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, be more attractive than good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(poverty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(poverty, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(illiteracy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inequality, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(poverty, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(evil, be more attractive than good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(evil, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(evil, has quality evil)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality bad)