inequality: is economic problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is economic problem 1.00
is economic 0.90
be bad for economic growth 0.87
affect economic growth 0.86
is social problem 0.85
affect economic inequality 0.85
be bad for economy 0.84
has state problem 0.83
be good for economy 0.83
is environmental problem 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(inequality, be good for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inequality, is social problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(inequality, affect economic inequality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(inequality, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)