inequality: is environmental problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental problem 1.00
is environmental 0.92
is social problem 0.83
is economic problem 0.82
has state problem 0.80
be problem for society 0.77
affect air pollution 0.77
contribute to pollution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(polarization, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, affect air pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(overpopulation, contribute to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is environmental problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inequality, is social problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(inequality, has state problem)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(inequality, be problem for society)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, affect air pollution)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(overpopulation, contribute to pollution)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(inequality, is environmental problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)