inequality: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is bad thing 0.97
is thing 0.95
is necessarily bad thing 0.89
is necessarily thing 0.86
have taste good 0.78
has quality good 0.78
be in sport important to us 0.78
be bad for business 0.76
be important from standpoint 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(evil, have taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(evil, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(barrier, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(evil, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(evil, have taste good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(barrier, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(issue, be in sport important to us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(barrier, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(issue, be in sport important to us)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(evil, have taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(evil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(overpopulation, is thing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(overpopulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(overpopulation, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(overpopulation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inequality, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(inequality, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(inequality, be important from standpoint)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inequality, be bad for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is good thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, have taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(evil, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(issue, be in sport important to us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(inequality, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(barrier, has quality good)