inequality: is social

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social 1.00
is social problem 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is social)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(poverty, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poverty, is social)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(inequality, is social)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inequality, is social problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(poverty, is social)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)