inequality: is social problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.68
, barrier
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, evil
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings illiteracy
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.35
, polarization
Weight: 0.35
, injustice
Weight: 0.34
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social problem 1.00
is social 0.88
be problem for society 0.87
is economic problem 0.85
has state problem 0.85
is environmental problem 0.83
be different from sociological problems 0.81
create problems 0.79
is minor problem 0.78
be problem in jakarta 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evil, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(evil, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(problem, be different from sociological problems)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is social)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evil, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(problem, be different from sociological problems)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(poverty, is social)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poverty, is social)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(overpopulation, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(overpopulation, is minor problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inequality, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is social)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(inequality, is social)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is economic problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(inequality, is environmental problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(inequality, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(inequality, be problem for society)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is environmental problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(poverty, is social)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in jakarta)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is minor problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(evil, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(inequality, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(problem, be different from sociological problems)