infection: be more common in elderly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents etiology
Weight: 0.65
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.65
, disease
Weight: 0.65
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.81
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.77
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.77
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.76
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in elderly 1.00
be more common in elderly individuals 0.95
affect elderly 0.89
is more common 0.83
be more common in individuals 0.82
is more common now 0.81
be more common in males 0.81
were more common in past 0.80
become more common 0.80
is common 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become more common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(infection, be more common in elderly)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(infection, be more common in elderly individuals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(infection, be more common in elderly individuals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(infection, is common)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(infection, be more common in elderly individuals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(infection, be more common in elderly individuals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(infection, is common)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(infection, is common)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(infection, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(infection, be more common in elderly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(infection, be more common in elderly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(infection, be more common in elderly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lyme disease, become more common)