infection: pose threat patient experiences to integument

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents etiology
Weight: 0.65
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.65
, disease
Weight: 0.65
, surgical procedure
Weight: 0.64
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.81
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.77
, infective endocarditis
Weight: 0.77
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.76
, candidiasis
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
pose threat patient experiences to integument 1.00
pose threat patient experiences 0.97
be constant risk to patient 0.78
is serious threat 0.77
is threat 0.77
be constant risk to patient on agents 0.76
be serious threat after burn 0.75
be constant risk to patient on immunosuppressive agents 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(infection, pose threat patient experiences)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(infection, is serious threat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(infection, be constant risk to patient on immunosuppressive agents)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(infection, be serious threat after burn)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(infection, is serious threat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(infection, is serious threat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(infection, be serious threat after burn)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(infection, be constant risk to patient on immunosuppressive agents)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(infection, be serious threat after burn)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(infection, be constant risk to patient on immunosuppressive agents)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, is serious threat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(infection, be serious threat after burn)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(infection, be constant risk to patient on immunosuppressive agents)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(infection, pose threat patient experiences to integument)