inflammation: be bad for healing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents immune response
Weight: 0.67
, mechanism
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.75
, gastritis
Weight: 0.51
, pericarditis
Weight: 0.44
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.37
, autoimmunity
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for healing 1.00
be good for healing 0.99
be important to healing process 0.92
prevent healing 0.91
hinder healing 0.88
take long heal 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(gastritis, take long heal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(gastritis, take long heal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gastritis, take long heal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(inflammation, be bad for healing)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(inflammation, be good for healing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be good for healing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(inflammation, prevent healing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(inflammation, be important to healing process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be good for healing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(inflammation, hinder healing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(inflammation, prevent healing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(inflammation, prevent healing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be important to healing process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, be good for healing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, prevent healing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(inflammation, hinder healing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(inflammation, hinder healing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be important to healing process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, hinder healing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(inflammation, be important to healing process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(inflammation, be bad for healing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for healing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gastritis, take long heal)