inflammation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents immune response
Weight: 0.67
, mechanism
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.75
, gastritis
Weight: 0.51
, pericarditis
Weight: 0.44
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.37
, autoimmunity
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality question 0.76
be bad for body 0.76
is good thing 0.75
be in body bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(symptom, has quality worse)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pericarditis, has quality worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(symptom, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pericarditis, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pericarditis, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inflammation, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inflammation, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(inflammation, be in body bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(inflammation, be bad for body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflammation, be in body bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be in body bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(inflammation, be bad for body)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(inflammation, be bad for body)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be bad for body)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, be in body bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pericarditis, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(symptom, has quality worse)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)