inflammation: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents immune response
Weight: 0.67
, mechanism
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.75
, gastritis
Weight: 0.51
, pericarditis
Weight: 0.44
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.37
, autoimmunity
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
has state problem 0.84
has quality question 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(inflammation, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(inflammation, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(inflammation, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)