inflammation: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents immune response
Weight: 0.67
, mechanism
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.75
, gastritis
Weight: 0.51
, pericarditis
Weight: 0.44
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.37
, autoimmunity
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state concern 0.84
has state condition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(inflammation, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(inflammation, has state concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state concern)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has state concern)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state concern)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(inflammation, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pelvic inflammatory disease, has state condition)