inflammation: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents immune response
Weight: 0.67
, mechanism
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.63
, symptom
Weight: 0.63
, pathology
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.75
, gastritis
Weight: 0.51
, pericarditis
Weight: 0.44
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.37
, autoimmunity
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
has quality good 0.78
has quality bad 0.75
is hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pathology, is hard)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pathology, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pathology, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pathology, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pathology, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(gastritis, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pathology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(pathology, is hard)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(gastritis, is hard)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(gastritis, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inflammation, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(inflammation, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inflammation, is thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(inflammation, is thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inflammation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflammation, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is thing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(inflammation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(inflammation, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pathology, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(gastritis, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pathology, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(inflammation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pathology, is hard)