inflation: be problem in africa

Related concepts

Parents	rate Weight: 0.68 , issue Weight: 0.64 , variable Weight: 0.62 , interest rate Weight: 0.61 , concern Weight: 0.60
Siblings	crisis Weight: 0.33 , index Weight: 0.33 , inequality Weight: 0.32 , sector Weight: 0.32 , housing Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be problem in africa	1.00
be problem in south africa	0.96
be important in africa	0.92
be popular in africa	0.89
be such problem in america	0.87
be popular in south africa	0.86
affect estate in africa	0.82
was problem for americans	0.81
affect estate in south africa	0.81
was problem for romans	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(inflation, be problem in africa)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(interest rate, affect estate in south africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(inflation, be problem in africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(interest rate, affect estate in south africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(interest rate, affect estate in south africa)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in africa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(issue, be such problem in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(interest rate, affect estate in south africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(sector, be important in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(sector, be important in africa)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(inflation, be problem in africa)

Similarity expansion

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(inflation, affect estate in africa)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(inflation, affect estate in south africa)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(inflation, was problem for romans)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(inflation, was problem for americans)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(inflation, was problem for americans)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(inflation, affect estate in africa)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(inflation, affect estate in south africa)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(inflation, affect estate in south africa)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(inflation, affect estate in africa)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(inflation, was problem for americans)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(inflation, affect estate in south africa)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(inflation, affect estate in africa)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(inflation, was problem for romans)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(inflation, was problem for romans)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(inflation, was problem for americans)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(inflation, was problem for romans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(inflation, be problem in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(interest rate, affect estate in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.33

Typical(inflation, be problem in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(interest rate, affect estate in south africa)