inflation: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rate
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, interest rate
Weight: 0.61
, concern
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crisis
Weight: 0.33
, index
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.32
, sector
Weight: 0.32
, housing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
has quality change 0.86
be in quality of life 0.83
has quality cost 0.82
is low good 0.81
be good for business 0.80
has quality news 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, has quality change)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(housing, is quality)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(index, is low good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(interest rate, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(housing, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(housing, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(housing, is quality)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(housing, is quality)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(index, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(index, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(index, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(index, is low good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(index, is low good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(inflation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inflation, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(housing, is quality)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(index, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, is low good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(interest rate, has quality change)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)