inflation: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rate
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, interest rate
Weight: 0.61
, concern
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crisis
Weight: 0.33
, index
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.32
, sector
Weight: 0.32
, housing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is good thing 0.97
is thing 0.94
is necessarily bad thing 0.90
be bad for buuhan 0.86
is necessarily thing 0.85
is horrible 0.80
be bad for business 0.80
has quality bad 0.79
is 2 bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(inflation, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(inequality, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inequality, is good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(inequality, is necessarily bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(index, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(index, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(inflation, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(inflation, is thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is good thing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inflation, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(inflation, is good thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inflation, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(inflation, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(inflation, is thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inflation, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(inflation, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(inflation, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inflation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inflation, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(inequality, is good thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, is necessarily bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(index, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inflation, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)