influence: was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.65
, change
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, drug
Weight: 0.57
Siblings relationship
Weight: 0.61
, folk music
Weight: 0.60
, background
Weight: 0.60
, progressive rock
Weight: 0.59
, moisture
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula 1.00
was in southeast asia stronger 0.96
was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula 0.96
was in southeast asia 0.93
sicily major areas of was europe 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in malay peninsula)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(influence, sicily major areas of was europe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(influence, sicily major areas of was europe)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(influence, sicily major areas of was europe)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(influence, was in southeast asia)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(influence, sicily major areas of was europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(influence, was in southeast asia stronger in peninsula)