influenza: be considered serious infection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.76
, pathogen
Weight: 0.68
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, vaccine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings flu
Weight: 0.39
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.39
, smallpox
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, computer virus
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered serious infection 1.00
be considered infection 0.94
is zoonotic disease 0.80
is communicable disease 0.79
has state disease 0.77
is active virus 0.77
be active virus 0.77
is emerging disease 0.76
has state virus 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state virus)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, is communicable disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chickenpox, is communicable disease)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, is communicable disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(smallpox, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(smallpox, has state disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(flu, has state disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(flu, has state virus)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(flu, has state virus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(influenza, is active virus)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(influenza, has state disease)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(influenza, be active virus)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(influenza, has state disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(influenza, has state virus)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(influenza, is active virus)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(influenza, be active virus)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(influenza, has state virus)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(influenza, is active virus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(influenza, be active virus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state virus)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be active virus)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is active virus)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is communicable disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chickenpox, is communicable disease)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smallpox, has state disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(flu, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(flu, has state virus)