influenza: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.76
, pathogen
Weight: 0.68
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, vaccine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings flu
Weight: 0.39
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.39
, smallpox
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, computer virus
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
is global concern 0.89
has state problem 0.84
is health issue 0.75
is public health issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(influenza, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(infection, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(infection, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, has state concern)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(smallpox, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(smallpox, has state concern)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(smallpox, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smallpox, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(flu, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(flu, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(influenza, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(influenza, is global concern)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(influenza, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(influenza, is health issue)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(influenza, is global concern)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(influenza, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(influenza, is health issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(influenza, is public health issue)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(influenza, is global concern)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is global concern)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(influenza, is public health issue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is public health issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(influenza, is health issue)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(influenza, is public health issue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is health issue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(influenza, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(infection, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(smallpox, has state concern)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(smallpox, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(flu, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(infection, has state problem)