information: be moved around within computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.62
, explanation
Weight: 0.60
, website
Weight: 0.60
Siblings historical site
Weight: 0.70
, computer database
Weight: 0.67
, remote control
Weight: 0.65
, military intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, indicator
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be moved around within computer 1.00
move around in computer 0.92
be transferred from one computer 0.85
be transferred from one computer to another 0.84
be in computer 0.82
was used before computers 0.82
goes into computer 0.80
be from sensors sent to central computer 0.77
be seen on computer monitor 0.76
be from sensors sent to computer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(information, be moved around within computer)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(information, move around in computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(information, move around in computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(information, move around in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(information, be in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(information, move around in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(information, be in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(information, be in computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(information, be in computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(information, goes into computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(information, goes into computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(information, goes into computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(information, goes into computer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(information, was used before computers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(information, was used before computers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(information, be seen on computer monitor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(information, be seen on computer monitor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(information, was used before computers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(information, was used before computers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(information, be seen on computer monitor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(information, be seen on computer monitor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(information, be moved around within computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(information, be moved around within computer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(information, be moved around within computer)