infrared: be used in everyday life

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wavelength
Weight: 0.57
, transmission
Weight: 0.52
, communication
Weight: 0.50
, type
Weight: 0.49
, device
Weight: 0.49
Siblings ultraviolet
Weight: 0.33
, gamma ray
Weight: 0.33
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33
, galvanometer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in everyday life 1.00
be used in life 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ultraviolet, be used in everyday life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ultraviolet, be used in life)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(ultraviolet, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ultraviolet, be used in everyday life)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ultraviolet, be used in life)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ultraviolet, be used in life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(infrared, be used in everyday life)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(infrared, be used in life)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(infrared, be used in life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(infrared, be used in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(infrared, be used in everyday life)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ultraviolet, be used in everyday life)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(infrared, be used in everyday life)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(ultraviolet, be used in life)