inhalation: be considered active process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.59
, route
Weight: 0.56
, pathway
Weight: 0.53
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.49
, exposure
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.32
, enema
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered active process 1.00
be active process process 0.95
be active process passive process 0.93
be described as active process 0.93
be considered process 0.90
is active 0.88
is passive process 0.84
has physical part process 0.83
be described as process 0.80
is chemical process 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered active process)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(inhalation, is active)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is active)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(inhalation, is active)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is active)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical process)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)