inhalation: be described as active process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.59
, route
Weight: 0.56
, pathway
Weight: 0.53
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.49
, exposure
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.32
, enema
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be described as active process 1.00
be described as process 0.93
be considered active process 0.93
be active process process 0.89
be active process passive process 0.88
be considered process 0.84
is active 0.83
be described 0.83
has physical part process 0.82
is passive process 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ammonium sulfate, be described)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(ammonium sulfate, be described)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ammonium sulfate, be described)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(inhalation, is active)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is active)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(inhalation, is active)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is active)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(ammonium sulfate, be described)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)