inhalation: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.59
, route
Weight: 0.56
, pathway
Weight: 0.53
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.49
, exposure
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.32
, enema
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
be active process process 0.88
be considered process 0.85
be active process passive process 0.85
be considered active process 0.83
be described as active process 0.82
is passive process 0.82
be described as process 0.81
is chemical process 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inhalation, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process process)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)