inhalation: is passive process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.59
, route
Weight: 0.56
, pathway
Weight: 0.53
, mucous membrane
Weight: 0.49
, exposure
Weight: 0.49
Siblings spray
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.32
, enema
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is passive process 1.00
be active process passive process 0.97
is passive 0.94
be active process process 0.86
be considered active process 0.84
has physical part process 0.82
be described as active process 0.81
be considered process 0.81
is chemical process 0.76
be described as process 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive process)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(inhalation, is passive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be considered process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, be described as process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(inhalation, be described as process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(inhalation, be considered active process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be described as process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inhalation, be active process passive process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as active process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process process)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(inhalation, be described as process)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(inhalation, be active process passive process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical process)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)