inheritance: has quality wrong

Related concepts

Parents	unearned income Weight: 0.62 , tax Weight: 0.59 , mechanism Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.57 , matter Weight: 0.57
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.34 , estate Weight: 0.33 , infidelity Weight: 0.31 , retirement Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality wrong	1.00
has quality bad	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(inheritance, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality wrong)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(estate, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(infidelity, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(infidelity, has quality wrong)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(infidelity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(infidelity, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(estate, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(estate, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(inheritance, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(inheritance, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(inheritance, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(inheritance, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Salient(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(inheritance, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality wrong)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(infidelity, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(estate, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(inheritance, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)