injury: were common occurrence among first fliers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents complication
Weight: 0.64
, pain
Weight: 0.63
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.61
, tragedy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings achilles tendon
Weight: 0.73
, whiplash
Weight: 0.72
, knee
Weight: 0.70
, swelling
Weight: 0.70
, mental illness
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were common occurrence among first fliers 1.00
were common among first flyers 0.92
is common 0.77
become more common 0.76
become common 0.76
is common now 0.76
is side common 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, become more common)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is common)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, become common)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, is common now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(mental illness, is common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is common)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(mental illness, become common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mental illness, become common)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mental illness, is common now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mental illness, is common now)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mental illness, become more common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mental illness, become more common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(injury, were common among first flyers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(injury, were common among first flyers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(injury, were common among first flyers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common among first flyers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(mental illness, is common)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(mental illness, is common now)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(mental illness, become common)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, were common occurrence among first fliers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(mental illness, become more common)