ink: be more expensive than printers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents composition
Weight: 0.59
, paint
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ascorbic acid
Weight: 0.33
, dye
Weight: 0.33
, phosphoric acid
Weight: 0.33
, paper
Weight: 0.33
, wax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than printers 1.00
be for printers expensive 0.97
be for printers damn expensive 0.93
be for printers 0.93
be used in printing 0.81
is more expensive 0.81
come out of inkjet 0.81
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(paint, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(paint, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(paint, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(paint, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ink, be for printers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(ink, be used in printing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ink, be for printers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ink, come out of inkjet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ink, come out of inkjet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ink, be for printers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ink, be used in printing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(ink, come out of inkjet)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ink, be for printers expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ink, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ink, be for printers expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(ink, be used in printing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ink, be for printers expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ink, be for printers expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ink, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ink, be for printers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ink, come out of inkjet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(ink, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ink, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ink, is more expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(ink, be used in printing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ink, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ink, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ink, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(paint, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(ink, be more expensive than printers)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(paint, is expensive)