insect: be beneficial to man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.66
, wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, biological agent
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.78
, housefly
Weight: 0.77
, aphid
Weight: 0.73
, ladybug
Weight: 0.73
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to man 1.00
be helpful to human 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, be beneficial to man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ladybug, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ladybug, be beneficial to man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(insect, be beneficial to man)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(insect, be helpful to human)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(insect, be helpful to human)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(insect, be helpful to human)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(insect, be helpful to human)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(insect, be beneficial to man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insect, be beneficial to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(insect, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ladybug, be beneficial to man)