insect: be good for garden

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.66
, wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, biological agent
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.78
, housefly
Weight: 0.77
, aphid
Weight: 0.73
, ladybug
Weight: 0.73
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for garden 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, be good for garden)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ladybug, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ladybug, be good for garden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(insect, be good for garden)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(insect, be good for garden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(insect, be good for garden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(insect, be good for garden)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ladybug, be good for garden)