insect: be helpful to human

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.66
, wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, biological agent
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.78
, housefly
Weight: 0.77
, aphid
Weight: 0.73
, ladybug
Weight: 0.73
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful to human 1.00
be beneficial to man 0.76
be important in nature 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, be beneficial to man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ladybug, be beneficial to man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ladybug, be beneficial to man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(insect, be helpful to human)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(insect, be beneficial to man)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(insect, be important in nature)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(insect, be beneficial to man)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(insect, be important in nature)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(insect, be important in nature)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insect, be beneficial to man)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insect, be important in nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(insect, be helpful to human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(insect, be helpful to human)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(insect, be helpful to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(ladybug, be beneficial to man)