insight: be calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.60
, analysis
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, understanding
Weight: 0.56
, attribute
Weight: 0.56
Siblings knowledge
Weight: 0.33
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.33
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, author
Weight: 0.31
, honesty
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(experience, be calculated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(experience, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(experience, be calculated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(insight, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(insight, be calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(insight, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(insight, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(experience, be calculated)