instrument: were placed in short circuit test

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents percussion instrument
Weight: 0.73
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.72
, artifact
Weight: 0.68
, device
Weight: 0.65
Siblings negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.83
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.80
, bass guitar
Weight: 0.75
, bass clarinet
Weight: 0.74
, organ
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
were placed in short circuit test 1.00
were placed for short circuit test 1.00
were placed in circuit test 0.97
were placed for circuit test 0.97
were placed on high voltage side 0.81
were placed on voltage side 0.80
be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit 0.78
be placed at back 0.78
be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit 0.78
were placed on high tension side 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(brass instrument, be placed at back)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, be placed at back)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, be placed at back)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(brass instrument, be placed at back)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed for short circuit test)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(instrument, were placed for short circuit test)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed for short circuit test)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed on high tension side)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed for short circuit test)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(instrument, were placed on high tension side)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed on high tension side)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed on high voltage side)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(instrument, were placed on high tension side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be placed at back)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(brass instrument, be placed at back)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, be run by energy represented as resistors in circuit)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(instrument, were placed in short circuit test)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(device, be run by electrical energy represented as resistors in circuit)