insurance: be expensive for drivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, operating expense
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, payment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive for drivers 1.00
be for drivers expensive 1.00
be more expensive for drivers 0.98
be expensive for young drivers 0.96
be for young drivers expensive 0.96
be for drivers 0.95
be more expensive for young drivers 0.95
be cheaper with drivers 0.94
be high for drivers 0.93
be expensive for teenage drivers 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(insurance, be expensive for drivers)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive for young drivers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(insurance, be expensive for young drivers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive for teenage drivers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(insurance, be expensive for teenage drivers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(insurance, be expensive for young drivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive for teenage drivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive for young drivers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(insurance, be expensive for teenage drivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive for drivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(insurance, be expensive for drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive for drivers)