insurance: be expensive in canada

Related concepts

Parents	financial institution Weight: 0.64 , operating expense Weight: 0.62 , sector Weight: 0.60 , condition Weight: 0.60 , payment Weight: 0.59
Siblings	mortgage lender Weight: 0.35 , automobile industry Weight: 0.34 , online banking Weight: 0.33 , banking Weight: 0.33 , health Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be expensive in canada	1.00
be expensive in usa	0.90
were important in australia	0.84
be cheaper in quebec	0.83
is uk	0.82
were important in australia between 1901-1914	0.80
be expensive in florida	0.80
be mandatory in usa	0.79
become in india	0.79
be high in ontario	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(sector, become in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(banking, is uk)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(mortgage lender, is uk)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(online banking, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(sector, become in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(online banking, is uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(online banking, is uk)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(mortgage lender, is uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(mortgage lender, is uk)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(banking, is uk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(banking, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(insurance, be expensive in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive in florida)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(insurance, be mandatory in usa)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(insurance, be mandatory in usa)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(insurance, be expensive in florida)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(insurance, be mandatory in usa)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(insurance, be expensive in florida)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be mandatory in usa)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Salient(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(sector, become in india)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(online banking, is uk)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(mortgage lender, is uk)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(banking, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(sector, become in india)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

Typical(insurance, be expensive in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)