insurance: be higher than female

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, operating expense
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, payment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher than female 1.00
be higher for males 0.89
be for man higher than for woman 0.83
be higher for people under 25 0.80
be higher for person under 25 0.80
be higher for guys 0.77
were for women 0.75
be better than public 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher than female)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sector, be better than public)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sector, be better than public)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sector, be better than public) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(insurance, be higher than female)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(insurance, be higher than female)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(insurance, be higher for males)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(insurance, be for man higher than for woman)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(insurance, be higher for males)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be higher for males)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher for males)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(insurance, be higher for people under 25)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insurance, be for man higher than for woman)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(insurance, be for man higher than for woman)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(insurance, be higher for people under 25)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be higher for people under 25)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher for people under 25)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be for man higher than for woman)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher than female)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(insurance, be higher than female) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sector, be better than public)