insurance: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, operating expense
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, payment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be in business important 0.99
be in business 0.93
is business 0.93
be needed for business 0.88
be important in servicescapes 0.82
affect businesses 0.81
be important for economic growth 0.80
be important at work 0.80
act impact on business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(financial institution, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(financial institution, affect businesses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(condition, be important in servicescapes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, affect businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health, act impact on business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(banking, is business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(condition, be important in servicescapes)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(financial institution, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(insurance, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(banking, is business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(banking, is business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(health, act impact on business)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(health, act impact on business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(insurance, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be in business important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be in business)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(insurance, is business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(insurance, be in business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(insurance, be in business important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(insurance, is business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be needed for business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(insurance, be needed for business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(insurance, be in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(insurance, is business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(insurance, be needed for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(insurance, be needed for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(insurance, be in business important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(insurance, be in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(insurance, is business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insurance, be in business important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(financial institution, affect businesses)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(banking, is business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(health, act impact on business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(financial institution, affect businesses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(financial institution, be important for economic growth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(condition, be important in servicescapes)