insurance: has state company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.64
, operating expense
Weight: 0.62
, sector
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.60
, payment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.35
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.34
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.33
, health
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state company 1.00
pay company 0.84
has state development 0.79
has state jobs 0.77
has state job 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has state company)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has state company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sector, has state development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sector, has state development)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(financial institution, has state jobs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(banking, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sector, has state development)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(insurance, has state company)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(financial institution, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(insurance, has state company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(banking, has state job)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(banking, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(insurance, has state company)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(insurance, pay company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(insurance, pay company)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(insurance, pay company)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(insurance, pay company)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(insurance, has state company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(banking, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(financial institution, has state jobs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(insurance, has state company)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sector, has state development)