integration: be critical to practice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, service
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, migration
Weight: 0.33
, separation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical to practice 1.00
be critical to practice of project management 0.88
be essential field of study 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(service, be essential field of study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(service, be essential field of study)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(service, be essential field of study)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(service, be essential field of study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integration, be critical to practice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(integration, be critical to practice)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be essential field of study)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(integration, be critical to practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be essential field of study)