integration: be important in marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, service
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, migration
Weight: 0.33
, separation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in marketing 1.00
be important in business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(integration, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(integration, be important in marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(integration, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(integration, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(integration, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(integration, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(integration, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(integration, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)